Reports from an adventurous learning journey (Part 1)

This is the first report of a series of personal experiences in learning the statistical programming language R to acquire competencies of a data scientist. In this kick-off article, I will present an example, why cohort learning in the age of individualisation is not appropriate anymore. I will suggest an alternative, present my earned certificates and explain why I interrupted (or aborted?) a nine-course introduction to data science taught by professors of John Hopkins University and offered via the MOOC-platform Coursera.

journey1

Beginning with December – when in a blog entry I recommended a book on Machine Learning with R – I initiated a new personal enterprise: Learning the statistical programming language R to acquire competencies of a data scientist. With "learning enterprise" I do not mean to get just interested in a new subject, to read from time to time a relevant book and to look into some web-based tutorials. No, with "enterprise" I mean a much bigger undertaking, to focus and concentrate several months on a systematic study for a new set of qualifications. 

Coursera-Certificate-Toolbox

I started with a nine-course introduction to data science, taught by three professors of  John Hopkins University and offered via the MOOC-platform Coursera. After I finished successfully two courses with certificates I turned impatient with teaching style and course philosophy.  My dissatisfaction was not so much caused by these professors or by this special course design but had more abstract reasons: As an experienced adult learner with a very attractive job I had no need to provide evidence of some acquired general qualifications as most of the course participants did. I was rather looking for some kind of Personal Knowledge which I could combine with my own life and working experiences.  After a long time again in the learner role, I found it very strange that I had to spend much time on material arranged by other people which I  could not need and had, on the other hand, to learn material superficially or to skip altogether, which was very useful for me. 

Coursera-Certificate-R-Programming

To exemplify the situation more in detail: In the third course on Getting and Cleaning Data we had to learn different ways to get data into the R environment: To download it with URLs, to scrap it from web pages, to load it from Excel sheets, to collect it via an API. But – for instance – we didn't learn how to get data from an SQL database. I appreciate that all these different methods are potentially important and as a data scientist one should know how to apply them. I also understand that it is impossible to learn all the different cases in detail. But I disagree that the best teaching method is an exemplary journey through some of these potentially important methods. A teaching strategy which would have better suited me would haven been a systematic and complete list of all methods with their pointers to the relevant R packages and supplemented with some prototypical program snippets to get started with. After getting a systematic overview and helpful material for future usage, one should have the opportunity to choose two or three methods and learn the nitty-gritty in practical assignments.

How to support the self-determined learner?

Consequently, I stopped my course attendance and started to look for tutorials, courses and other learning material on my own. I have to confess that I didn't know how exciting but also how difficult this self-paced and self-determined learning approach was respectively is. Between us educators, we are talking routinely about self-determined learning , but it is quite a different thing to experience related problems yourself.

On a non-regular basis, I will share my experiences from this adventurous learning journey in a series of blog comments. This was the first one.

References

Hidalgo, C. (2015). Why Information Grows: The Evolution of Order, from Atoms to Economies. Basic Books.
Hidalgo, C. A., Orghian, D., Canals, J. A., Almeida, F. D., & Martin, N. (2021). How Humans Judge Machines. The MIT Press.
Collins, H. (2010). Tacit and Explicit Knowledge (Reprint). University of Chicago Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia Learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., Bove, W., Bryman, A., Mars, R., & Tapangco, L. (1996). When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 64.
Horton, S. V., & Lovitt, T. C. (1989). Construction and Implementation of Graphic Organizers for Academically Handicapped and Regular Secondary Students. Academic Therapy, 24(5), 625–640. https://doi.org/10.1177/105345128902400513
Dennison, R. S., & Kiewra, K. A. (1993). Studying text supplements: Attention focusing and internal connection effects. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
Dehaene, S. (2009). Reading in the Brain: The New Science of How We Read (1st ed.). Penguin Books.
Bera, S. J., & Robinson, D. H. (2004). Exploring the Boundary Conditions of the Delay Hypothesis With Adjunct Displays. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 381.
Robinson, D. H., & Molina, E. (2002). The relative involvement of visual and auditory working memory when studying adjunct displays. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(1), 118–131.
McPherson, F. (2018). Effective Notetaking (3rd. revised edition). Wayz Press.
Lorch Jr, R. F., & Lorch, E. P. (1996). Effects of organizational signals on free recall of expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 38.
Meyer, B. J. (1987). Following the author’s top-level organization: An important skill for reading comprehension. Understanding Readers’ Understanding: Theory and Practice, 59–76.
Lorch Jr, R. F., & Lorch, E. P. (1996). Effects of organizational signals on text-processing strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(4), 537. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.4.537
Loman, N. L., & Mayer, R. E. (1983). Signaling techniques that increase the understandability of expository prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(3), 402. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.75.3.402
Hartley, J., Kenely, J., Owen, G., & Trueman, M. (1980). The Effect Of Headings On Children’s Recall From Prose Text. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 50(3), 304–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1980.tb00816.x
von Restorff, H. (1933). Über die Wirkung von Bereichsbildungen im Spurenfeld. Psychologische Forschung, 18(1), 299–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02409636
Cashen, V. M., & Leicht, K. L. (1970). Role of the isolation effect in a formal educational setting. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 484–486. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030286
Hershberger, W. A., & Terry, D. F. (1963). Complexity of Typographical Cueing in Programed and Conventional Texts. Technical Report. No. 7.
Crouse, J. H., & Idstein, P. (1972). Effects of encoding cues on prose learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(4), 309.
Thiede, K. W., & Anderson, M. C. M. (2003). Summarizing can improve metacomprehension accuracy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(2), 129–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00011-5
Anderson, V., & Hidi, S. (1988). Teaching students to summarize. Educational Leadership, 46(4), 26–28.
Lemaire, B., Mandin, S., Dessus, P., & Denhière, G. (2005). Computational cognitive models of summarization assessment skills. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci’2005), 1266–1271.
Westby, C., Culatta, B., Lawrence, B., & Hall-Kenyon, K. (2010). Summarizing expository texts. Topics in Language Disorders, 30(4), 275–287.
Day, J. D. (1980). Teaching summarization skills: A comparison of training methods. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Furtado, L., & Johnson, L. (2010). Enhancing summarization skills using twin texts: Instruction in narrative and expository text structures. Reading, 10(2).
Kintsch, E., Steinhart, D., Stahl, G., LSA Research Group, L. R. G., Matthews, C., & Lamb, R. (2000). Developing summarization skills through the use of LSA-based feedback. Interactive Learning Environments, 8(2), 87–109.
Budianto, A., Setyosari, P., Kuswandi, D., & Ulfa, S. (2022). Summaries Writing to Enhance Reading Comprehension: Systematic Literature Review from 2014 to 2021. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 149–161.
Dubé, C. E., & Lapane, K. L. (2014). Lay abstracts and summaries: Writing advice for scientists. Journal of Cancer Education, 29(3), 577–579.
Yuan ke, L., & Hoey, M. (2014). Strategies of writing summaries for hard news texts: A text analysis approach. Discourse Studies, 16(1), 89–105.
Gainey, K. M., Smith, J., McCaffery, K. J., Clifford, S., & Muscat, D. M. (2022). What Author Instructions Do Health Journals Provide for Writing Plain Language Summaries? A Scoping Review. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-022-00606-7
Aslani, G., Haghani, F., Moshtaghi, S., & Zeinali, S. (2013). A comparison of the effect of presenting advanced organizers in web-based instruction. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 200–203.
Atomatofa, R. (2013). Effects of advanced organizers on attainment and retention of students’ concept of gravity in Nigeria. International Journal of Research Studies in Educational Technology, 2(1), 1–10.
Glover, J. A., Bullock, R. G., & Dietzer, M. L. (1990). Advance organizers: Delay hypotheses. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 291.
Kirkman, G., & Shaw Jr, E. L. (1997). Effects of an Oral Advanced Organizer on Immediate and Delayed Retention.
Preiss, R. W., & Gayle, B. M. (2006). A meta-analysis of the educational benefits of employing advanced organizers. Classroom Communication and Instructional Processes: Advances through Meta-Analysis, 329–344.
Glover, J. A., Krug, D., Dietzer, M., George, B. W., & Hannon, S. M. (1990). “Advance” advance organizers. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28(1), 4–6.
Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom Instruction That Works: Research-Based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement. ASCD.
Lorch, R. F., Lorch, E. P., & Matthews, P. D. (1985). On-line processing of the topic structure of a text. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(3), 350–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(85)90033-6
Cook, N. M. (1981). Summaries: further issues and data. Educational Review, 33(3), 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013191810330305
Hartley, J., Goldie, M., & Steen, L. (1979). The role and position of summaries: Some issues and data. Educational Review, 31(1), 59–65.
Cook, N. M. (1981). Summaries: Further issues and data. Educational Review, 33(3), 215–222.
Lorch Jr, R. F., Lorch, E. P., & Matthews, P. D. (1985). On-line processing of the topic structure of a text. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(3), 350–362.
Brooks, L. W., Dansereau, D. F., Spurlin, J. E., & Holley, C. D. (1983). Effects of headings on text processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 292. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.75.2.292
Mayer, R. E., Dyck, J. L., & Cook, L. K. (1985). Techniques that help readers build mental models from scientific text: Definitions pretraining and signaling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(6), 1089. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.6.1089
Kardash, C. M., & Noel, L. K. (2000). How Organizational Signals, Need for Cognition, and Verbal Ability Affect Text Recall and Recognition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(3), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1011
Lemarié, J., Lorch Jr., R. F., & Péry-Woodley, M.-P. (2012). Understanding How Headings Influence Text Processing. Discours. Revue de Linguistique, Psycholinguistique et Informatique. A Journal of Linguistics, Psycholinguistics and Computational Linguistics, 10. https://doi.org/10.4000/discours.8600
Brooks, L. W., Dansereau, D. F., Holley, C. D., & Spurlin, J. E. (1983). Generation of descriptive text headings. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(2), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(83)90001-2
Sanchez, R. P., Lorch, E. P., & Lorch, R. F. (2001). Effects of Headings on Text Processing Strategies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(3), 418–428. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2000.1056

Von Peter Baumgartner

Seit mehr als 30 Jahren treiben mich die Themen eLearning/Blended Learning und (Hochschul)-Didaktik um. Als Universitätsprofessor hat sich dieses Interesse in 13 Bücher, knapp über 200 Artikel und 20 betreuten Dissertationen niedergeschlagen. Jetzt in der Pension beschäftige ich mich zunehmend auch mit Open Science und Data Science Education.

Eine Antwort auf „Reports from an adventurous learning journey (Part 1)“

I was looking at a portion of your posts on this site and I consider this site is really enlightening! Keep setting up…

Schreiben Sie einen Kommentar

Ihre E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert